Iterated Belief Change in the Situation Calculus
نویسندگان
چکیده
The ability to reason about action and change has long been considered a necessary component for any intelligent system. Many proposals have been offered in the past to deal with this problem. In this paper, we offer a new approach to belief change associated with performing actions that addresses some of the shortcomings of these approaches. In particular, our approach is based on a well-developed theory of action in the situation calculus extended to deal with belief. Moreover, our account handles nested belief, belief introspection, mistaken belief, and handles belief revision and belief update together with iterated belief change.
منابع مشابه
Belief change with noisy sensing in the situation calculus
Situation calculus has been applied widely in artificial intelligence to model and reason about actions and changes in dynamic systems. Since actions carried out by agents will cause constant changes of the agents’ beliefs, how to manage these changes is a very important issue. Shapiro et al. [22] is one of the studies that considered this issue. However, in this framework, the problem of noisy...
متن کاملRepresenting Beliefs in the Fluent Calculus
Action formalisms like the ¤uent calculus have been developed to endow logic-based agents with the abilities to reason about the effects of actions, to execute high-level strategies, and to plan. In this paper we extend the ¤uent calculus by a method for belief change, which allows agents to revise their internal model upon making observations that contradict this model. Unlike the existing com...
متن کاملIterated Belief Change and Exogeneous Actions in the Situation Calculus
We present a novel theory of action and change capable of dealing with discord between an agent’s beliefs and the results of its sensing. Previous work by Scherl and Levesque [9] and Shapiro et al. [10] have given accounts of iterated belief update and revision, and the ability to deal with mistaken beliefs. However, they assume that all actions, including exogenous actions beyond the agent’s c...
متن کاملIterated Belief Change and Exogenous Actions in the Situation Calculus
We present a novel theory of action and change capable of dealing with discord between an agent’s beliefs and the results of its sensing. Previous work by Scherl and Levesque [9] and Shapiro et al. [10] have given accounts of iterated belief update and revision, and the ability to deal with mistaken beliefs. However, they assume that all actions, including exogenous actions beyond the agent’s c...
متن کاملA Semantic Account of Iterated Belief Revision in the Situation Calculus
Recently Shapiro et al. explored the notion of iterated belief revision within Reiter’s version of the situation calculus. In particular, they consider a notion of belief defined as truth in the most plausible situations. To specify what an agent is willing to believe at different levels of plausibility they make use of so-called belief conditionals, which themselves neither refer to situations...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Artif. Intell.
دوره 175 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000